Compare
Raven vs Avoma
A free, open-source Avoma alternative - a live copilot with local notes, no per-seat platform, and no paywall from day one.
Avoma is a sales conversation-intelligence platform: recording, coaching analytics, deal insights, and scheduling for RevOps teams. It’s capable, but there’s no free tier (14-day trial), it’s per recorder seat, the coaching layer is a paid add-on, and it’s cloud + bot. Raven is free, open source, local, and helps you live during the call.
| Raven | Avoma | |
|---|---|---|
| Live in-call assist | Yes | No - analysis after the call |
| Free tier | Yes - full app | No - 14-day trial |
| Where your meetings live | Local SQLite | Avoma's cloud |
| Price | Free, open source (your own keys) | Startup $19/seat/mo; Organization $29; + Conversation Intelligence add-on $29/seat/mo |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Avoma has no permanent free plan. Base plans run $19/seat/mo (Startup, annual; $29 monthly) to $39/seat/mo (Enterprise), and the actual coaching/CI features are a $29/seat/mo add-on on top. A small sales team quickly lands north of $50/seat/mo all-in.
Raven is free; you pay your own AI/transcription usage (a few dollars a month for typical use), with no seat fee and no add-ons.
What Avoma does better (honestly)
Sales CI + RevOps: deal scorecards, coaching analytics, revenue intelligence, lead routing.
Built-in scheduling and deep CRM sync; free viewer seats for the wider team.
If you run a sales org and want coaching analytics wired into your pipeline, Avoma is built for that.
You don’t want to pay from day one with no free tier, plus per-seat add-ons.
You want live help in the call and meetings kept local.
You want a free, open-source, auditable tool.